The Looming Spectre of Regional Justice: What the South Dakota Judicial System knows about Hate Crime Cover-up.
The Judge played Russian Roulette with the 14 Amendment, and ended up triggering a chambered Extortion crisis. When you handle the Truth, assume that it's loaded. Don't play with it, and don't abuse it as a Stage-Prop. "Your sin shall find you out....for God is not mocked."
Why does the Sheriff turn white every time he sees me approaching? Because he knows I'm there to remind him of my $100,000 accomplice whom he has known about for months now, but has refused to investigate. Why has he not investigated? Because he knows there is zero crime here, that what is on the Warrant is the contrived legal depravity of a Hate Crime. "But this is not a civil action, but a crime against the State," I remind him. "I know," he says. "Doesn't the Government have a compelling interest in a $100,000 accomplice?" I ask. He knows that when a citizen reports a $100,000 crime, he is required by law to investigate. So he knows he's committing a crime by not doing so. But because the State Attorney and the Judge have the same information he has (Brief 1 and Brief 2), they must have signaled to him that they can make this go away without opening a can of worms by ramming a farce trial to a close before they lose control and it ends up in Federal hands. But his refusal to investigate has now triggered a 14th Amendment extortion charge.
I can show you from my digital logs that what you read here is being read in Washington, D.C., and that dozens of people in the South Dakota System of Justice have logged onto this site, some for hours on end. But what would even a very unlearned person know just from reading the first two pages?
That there were two of us.
That the State is hiding the fact that there were two of us.
That the State is making one person pay for damage (I have been thinning those shrubs I planted for 25 years--see below) done by two, even as it knows there were two of us.
The fact that the hate criminals Gerald Jensen and his partner Alice Intermill withheld from the Police that there were two of us demonstrates the nature of the Warrant as a botched hate crime. The Sheriff even says as much. All this is now known deep within the South Dakota Judiciary.
That the Judge tried to ram the Trial to a close knowing full well that she had created an irreconcilable conflict in the Fifth Amendment by ghosting my accomplice, which left me with a witness who would incriminate himself as my accomplice the minute he is forced to testify. To participate in such is a tyrannical farce is to consent to evil. Which leaves me no choice but to go sit in jail until the Federal Government takes up my appeal.
I can show you that people in the South Dakota Justice System have been reading all this for months now. What are they thinking? All they would have to do is come here and make me prove that there is a Second Vandal. In fact, I’ve been running after them for months begging them to make me prove that there is a Second Vandal. Because if there is no Second Vandal then they should arrest me for accusing the Police, the State Attorney, and Judge of the heinous crimes that follow if they are hiding the fact that there is a Second Vandal. But for 9 months now I have been accusing the Government of hiding the fact that there is a Second Vandal (There was no Vandalism and no crime here--and that is the point--the State has to pretend there was a crime in order to hide the fact that it is covering up a botched hate crime). Admit to the Second Vandal and the Warrant is proved to be an utter falsehood and a botched hate crime--and you know who it is from my very first post 9 months ago (my kind neighbor how merely helped me do what we do everyday). I have repeatedly asked the Court to allow me to give evidence before a magistrate (under penalty of law) of everything I have written so far. I have been summarily ignored. I would have either gone to jail for lying, or they would have had to acknowledge the Second Vandal (and their cover-up). But why can they not reveal the Second Vandal? Because revealing him would reveal the nature of the Warrant as a botched hate crime committed by two of the two richest MAGA’s in the county, the hate criminals Gerald Jensen/Alice Intermill. This is why the Sheriff goes white every time he sees me, why the State Attorney refuses to see me, and why the Judge simply ignores every word I say. Because they all know that the Second Vandal exists. So why do they keep denying that he does and allow themselves to be slandered by all the crimes that follow if there is a Second Vandal? Because of la familia Magafia, the “off the books” arrangement of “how things are done around here” inhouse, in the sense of “what goes on in South Dakota stays in South Dakota”--the New York Times frequently calls attention to the “selective enforcement” out here on the prairies. Traditionally, things could be “taken care of” without opening a can of worms. If you belong to a tribe you have patronage, i.e., the sharks (Magamonsters) at the top keep each other at bay, and you have protection as long as you swim alongside your chosen shark. Outside of this arrangement, you have no protection, and if the rich need to send you a message, the police will mysteriously show up. Every time they showed up here I told them, “I knew you were coming,” and “don’t destroy those cams.” They came the first time after he (Haman-Ahab) told me he would “mention me to the Sheriff.” If you can do this, you have more power than an Afghan warlord, who would have to pay billions to have this much violence at his disposal. The sharks use the police and legal system as their personal militia, and if they get caught, the former make their abuse of office go away by having a judge ram a sham trial to a close. If you try to report irregularities, the Sheriff will ignore you, the State Attorney will hide from you, and the Court will hurry the whole racket off the books. I was framed by the State Attorney, George Floyded by the Police, and railroaded by the Court. I boycotted this farce of a trial in protest, and fully expect to be arrested again. I have asked the Government to be put under a Federal jurisdiction if this happens to prevent being George Floyded again.
This was never meant to get this far. It was intended to be no more than just another “dust-up” of Mordecai the Jew, before throwing him back from whence he came. When I began pushing back, the police and the State Attorney doubled down and went into cover-up mode, certain that I did not have it in me to go the distance. As they kept doubling down, the matter snowballed until they now find themselves confronting the very real prospect of facing a Federal Prosecutor and a Federal Grand Jury. They could not simply vacate the Trial without exposing the frivolous and reckless nature of their abuse of office, so they got rid of the Jury Trial by shredding their most blatant lies. But the Warrant is in two parts: 1) trespass (a truckpark) and 2) thinning shrubs that I planted 25 years ago. For the latter they are now forced to seek compensation ($100,000 if you can read this without swallowing your eyeteeth). But now they stumbled into a trap of their own making. This is where they overplayed their hand, and where they will now face the charge of extortion: a Federal crime. Because in denying the existence of the Second Vandal, they now are forced to extort me for the entire (up to) $100,000. “He made a pit, and digged it, and is fallen into the ditch which he made.” The Judge played Russian Roulette with the 14 Amendment, and ended up triggering a chambered Extortion charge.
The average reader would deduce all this from the first pages. You can imagine what goes on in the minds of trained lawyers when they read this. I sent a link to the USD Law School and within ten minutes I could see people reading it all over the US and even Canada (likely visiting professors). Two people logged on from Washington D.C. But people in the South Dakota Judiciary have been reading this for months. Why doesn’t someone just say, “put up, or shut up.” That is, there is either a Second Vandal, or there is not a Second Vandal? Because every day I log onto their site (where you can make requests to the South Dakota Justice System) and hammer the same points: Extortion, hate crime, obstruction of justice. And every day I watch as people read from government sites. What are they thinking? Do they have a plan? How long can this go on? They tried ramming the Trial to a close, but I boycotted it to expose their farce. They can put me in jail, but all the questions raised here remain (and on the worldwide web): coverup, obstruction of justice, extortion, hate crime. This could bring down the entire South Dakota Justice System because their digital records will reveal that they have been reading this site for month and know everything you do. It is especially potent going into the Presidential election in light of the governor’s Presidential ambitions, which is why she is now tilting at her ill-starred Attorney General who she knows will feature in Democrat ads. Because the entire South Dakota Justice System is aware of it now. I had Nick Kristoff of the New York Times on the line early on, but he left the Times to run for governor of Oregon. Sooner or later this will hit the news.
What was intended to be a minor dustup of the police and State Attorney allowing themselves to be used to “take care” of things (rough up Mordecai the Jew again to show him his betters) got out of hand. And the Judge tried to make it go away by ramming the Trial to a close quickly before the elephant in the room (the Second Vandal) reaches critical mass. To the end, the judge pretended that the hate criminals Gerald Jensen/Alice Intermill were no more than upstanding citizens doing their duty as citizens. Nothing could be further from the truth. These are rich predators, who view the entire legal system as their personal militia to achieve their ends. He’s a vicious adulterer, who destroyed his family and threw his wife under the bus. To allow this farce of a trial to run its course would be to give a veneer of respectability to this adulterous Haman-Ahab and his partner who pant after poor Nabot’s head. I have never met this wicked Alicebel, but if she read (elsewhere on this site) what I said regarding her husband when wicked Haman-Ahab oppressed the widow last Spring, her hair would stand on end. That should have given wicked Haman-Ahab pause. Instead, like Pharaoh, he hardened his heart, and now finds himself hastened to Esther’s (final) banquet ("It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God"). But Mordecai the Jew could not bow to this murderer. He knew he was putting his life on the line.
It remains to be seen how they will now try to tie up all the loose ends here. I boycotted the trial, and have asked the South Dakota Judiciary to intervene because the crime of this Trial reeks to heaven. I imagine I can look to be arrested again, and perhaps spend time in jail. I’ll let God make the arrangements: “hitherto, the Lord hath helped me.” “The eternal God is my refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms.” But Mordecai must not bow to wicked Haman-Jezebel. I’ll spend the rest of my life in jail if I have to, and ask God to deliver me. I have learned to live, as David says, “in the presence of mine enemies.” For the lamb discovers that what he assumed were “shadows” in the valley, were, in fact, real enemies. God sets the table right there, and soon “his cup runs over.” He dozes off realizing that he’s in “the house of the Lord.” God is always at home (“even in the presence of His enemies''), and a Christian is always with God. “Lo, I am with you always.”